What Australian Companies Should Expect from a Penetration Test

A development team could follow strict coding guidelines, keep dependencies updated, and still ship a vulnerability that nobody realizes. This is because real attacks rarely follow an established checklist. An attacker could use an authorization rule that is weak coupled with an exposed API endpoint, misuse the password reset process or realize that a customer account can access other tenant’s information.

Professional penetration testing Brisbane businesses use for security assurance looks at systems from that adversarial perspective. Instead of asking if there’s security measures experienced testers will question whether those controls are able to be manipulated.

This difference is important to Australian organizations who deal with sensitive information like customer information as well as financial records, health records, or any other assets.

Scanning by automated means only tells a portion of the truth

Vulnerability scanners are useful. They can quickly identify outdated code or headers that are insecure (CVEs), known CVEs and obvious configuration errors. What they are not able to understand is how an application is supposed to behave.

You could consider a customer portal in which customers can alter the account number in a request and then retrieve a different invoices from a company. The scanner could not spot anything suspicious if the server returns perfectly valid results. A human tester will recognize the error in authorization immediately.

Testing for penetration on the web is a blend of manual and automated testing. Testers search for weaknesses in authentication, session, API behavior and configuration and access control and injection risk API behavior.

SaaS environments come with their own security risks

Cloud applications that are multi-tenant require extra caution in testing, since a single error can be devastating to many users at one time.

Saas penetration tests should focus on tenant isolation and privilege functions. It also includes API authorization, role change and recovery of accounts, data leakage, and integrations to external services. The tester has to not only discern if a function is functioning and if it is able to be altered to a degree that the developers would not have wanted.

A user, for instance, with a standard role may not find an administrative task in the interface. It doesn’t mean that they cannot call it directly. It is important to check the API, rather than just observing what appears.

Modern web-based applications have bigger attack area

Applications today typically combine JavaScript front-ends and APIs cloud service providers, identity providers and microservices. There can be weaknesses in any component as well being the trust relationship that exists between them.

These connections are followed by a thorough penetration test. Testers should look at the process of issuance of tokens as well as whether the endpoints are able to ensure authorization in a consistent manner in the way that user-controlled data is transferred between services, and whether it is possible for a flaw with a low risk to be chained with another weakness to create a major security risk.

Siege Cyber is specialized in this type of testing for applications. It is able to work with the latest frameworks and APIs as well with cloud-hosted apps and complicated architectures.

A helpful report could aid developers in resolving the issue

Finding vulnerabilities is only half the task. Security testing offers the most benefit when engineers are able to reproduce an issue, identify the danger, and fix it in a secure manner.

Siege Cyber reports contain evidence that includes reproduction steps and risks ratings. They also provide impacts analyses and practical advice on remediation and a detailed impact analysis. The executive description of the risk communicated to business leaders while the technical team receives the specifics needed to solve the issue. Rather than waiting until the report is finalized, important results can be communicated to the business stakeholder during the engagement.

The test after remediation adds a second layer of security by confirming that the problem has been fixed without introducing another one.

For companies that require independent validation, compliance evidence or more confidence prior to an important release the penetration test offers something software and policies are not able to provide give you: a safe opportunity to determine how a skilled attacker might actually approach the system. It is important to find the answer before the attacker.